Monday, July 4, 2016

Rights and Righteousness: The Moral Foundation for Liberty

What is freedom? A free society? And how do we produce it?

“Freedom,” according to the prevailing view, must be the unfettered pursuit of pleasure and enjoyment, i.e. the ability to satisfy all your heart’s desires so far as they don’t conflict with the basic rights of anyone else (or at least anyone else with the power to complain and to seek recourse). However, as traditional mores frequently conflict with such a self-serving view of freedom, a free society, it seems, must dismantle itself from all but perhaps the utter minimum of moral convictions. Those who want to produce such a society understand that this begins by breaking down the sources of our moral understanding, which are religion as well as the bonds created by the natural law, bonds which naturally oppose complete selfishness.

We see the destruction of these bonds taking place every day as people strive for the kind of freedom to do whatever they please. Men and women break the natural order of bonding either through infidelity, promiscuity, or perversion. Fathers and mothers break the natural order of bonding with their children through abortion, abandonment, and abuse. And children break the natural order of bonding with their parents through contempt, rebellion, and entitlement.

These fundamental familial bonds are the divinely-ordered basis for expanding one’s circle of care and compassion beyond oneself. Our connection to family is what leads us to transcend our selfish desires and to ultimately care for the well-being of other people in this world. Yet those “progressives” who promote this notion of moral-less liberty claim to want to make the world a better, fairer place as we all get what we want or as much of what we want as possible without killing and stealing (or without getting caught and punished).

This is why such a concept of freedom bears its own self-destruction. For who and what forms our wants and desires? Is it not the case that much of our impulses are shaped by things beyond our control? If so, then when we thoughtlessly act in accord with these wishes, we are not demonstrating any kind of freedom at all. In the end, we’re merely affirming our enslavement to the whims of our circumstances.

Thus the libertine is nothing but a slave, who dwells in a dismal illusion of liberty. His freedom is so free it flies away, probably to join his long-lost virtue, wherever it has gone. Nevertheless, there is something right in the libertine’s wrong notion of liberty. We could say that this distorted view of freedom, namely acting for the sake of our uninhibited pleasure, is a damaged reflection of the image of God within us. If true freedom is the ability to know, to do, and to be good, then God is the unique Being whose inherent wisdom, power, and righteousness provides the perfect liberty to act according to His desire with mesmerizing consistency. Freedom only exists in the domain of humanity as a divine grace, because only God can make us and our desires good.

This was a truth well-known to the founders of our country. They understood that to be able to guarantee the rights under this revolutionary kind of republic, righteousness is a requisite of the citizenry. Even the most cursory survey of their writings proves their perception that it is the balanced relationship between family, church, and government, which creates a society that promotes Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness (not to be confused with hedonism).
Benjamin Franklin
For example, Benjamin Franklin, who was more of a deist than a Christian, wrote: “Whereas true religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness . . . it is hereby earnestly recommended to the several States to take the most effectual measures for the encouragement thereof.” Rather than removing every vestige of religion from the public square, Franklin wanted religion to be promoted. 

Consider this prophetic insight from John Adams:

Statesmen . . . may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free Constitution is pure Virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People in a greater Measure than they have it now, They may change their Rulers and the forms of Government, but they will not obtain a lasting Liberty. They will only exchange Tyrants and Tyrannies.

These men and their fellow architects of our constitutional republic understood that a country of free, thriving people is not imposed, top-down fashion, via government and laws that enforce acceptable behavior, but rather by virtuous people who promote the sort of government which guarantees rights to various freedoms, such as the freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of religion, to petition, to bear arms, etc. As Samuel Adams, American Revolutionary and organizer of the Boston Tea Party, observed:

Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man.

Laws are meaningless without a populace that is virtuous, because, as John Adams points out:

We have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams
To have a free society, we need moral people. However, a government cannot produce morality in people; it can only guide those who already have it. God alone is the ground of all goodness, and goodness is the only consistent path towards liberty; hence, only within the will of God do we find perfect freedom. As Christians, we know that it was the Lord’s will for the Son to become flesh, to die, and to miraculously rise from the grave in order to reveal in human form the image of the invisible God, full of grace and truth. Our primary duty is to have a relationship with God, to love Him first and foremost. From this relationship flows the capacity to love our neighbors as ourselves.

In a rightly ordered State, the church ministers to us, reminding us of our values and providing accountability for one’s mastery and measure of virtue. Within this framework of fellowship, the gracious action of the Holy Spirit, and the working out of our own salvation through personal discipline, we become increasingly moral individuals, capable of self-rule. A government of such people, for such people, and by such people will establish just laws and select wise, virtuous leadership, thus producing a society with Liberty and Justice for all. If we would have freedom rather than tyranny in this land, then we must continue to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.


  1. Excellent and insightful reminder (and to some a new revelation) of the foundation of true freedom. Thank you, Marie!

  2. Wow, Marie. Your writing continues to impress. Love this, "Thus the libertine is nothing but a slave, who dwells in a dismal illusion of liberty. His freedom is so free it flies away, probably to join his long-lost virtue, wherever it has gone." That's so brilliant, funny, and searing. Lots of great points. Lots of great quotes. Thought it was a little off at one point. Not sure I understand this quote: "Our connection to family is what leads us to transcend our selfish desires and to ultimately care for the well-being of other people in this world." It's well written, but it seems to contradict some later points. Plus, it's written as a statement of fact, and it's just not true in all instances. I may have missed something, though.

  3. Thanks for the kind remarks, DL. That quote you mention is in reference to fundamental familial bonds, viz. between a child and parent. A baby only considers his own hunger and comfort, but in the very act of receiving nourishment and care, he bonds with his mother and his father. They become important to him for selfish reasons at first but there is a deeper connection forming as well. That's the beginning of caring about someone else, right? Ideally, within a family we develop the relational skills that would apply to those outside of our closest circle. You're right that it won't occur in all instances; my comment is reference to the God-ordained purpose and design of family not what always is the case in a fallen world.

  4. I had a feeling I misunderstood something, sort of like a Chess puzzle. At least I got an explanation from you that makes sense.

  5. David, I can't understand Muslims in this country, or others, that seem to love freedom of speech, use it every chance they get, but when someone that don't have their views it, they go crazy, get mad, or send death threats. I hope someone will answer my question.